Hazrat Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq By Shaykh Mufti Taqi Usmani A FAMOUS BOOK WRITTEN IN DEFENCE OF HAZRAT MUAVIA [R.A] Hazrat Ameer Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Rivayaat By Shaykh Muhammad. Ameer Muawiya Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq Author Mufti Taqi Usmani. May Click to Download Click to Read on Scribd. Post a Comment. For More Islamic Books For More Islamic Books Visit For More I.

Author: Goltidal Yozshukasa
Country: Yemen
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Politics
Published (Last): 23 July 2016
Pages: 119
PDF File Size: 12.11 Mb
ePub File Size: 6.4 Mb
ISBN: 275-7-61262-434-9
Downloads: 13893
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Samuk

But the issue is that we do not have reliable and undisputed information about such incidents. Since the matter is grave, we should evaluate the authenticity of the events reported ayr the history. Therefore, the issue becomes extremely grave.

The book is available at the following links: Other than that, there is nothing except theories of different people.

Hazrat Muawiya( R. A) Aur Tarikhi Haqaiq : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

We also know that all such people disguised themselves in mainstream Muslims. Regards Respected Sister Wa alaikum us salam wa Rahmatullah The views presented in the books belong to their authors and they are responsible for providing the answer raised on their work.

Since you’ve mentioned that you are not a ShiaI’ll urge you to study it with an open mind and analyze its content critically. Tabari is available on the following link. Although we are not sure about authenticity of such reports.

Because I am the student of history and I know what the Amir Muawia did in his 20 years rule.

Allah, in the name of, the Most Affectionate, the Eternally Merciful. Even we cannot reach at a decisive conclusion about events happening in our life. My point is that if you want to quote an example it should be a good example.

If the matter is disturbing you, conduct your own research in the light of above-mentioned procedure. Although amefr at individual capacity was possible but how could you believe that all companions committed a great crime collectively while the evidence against them is nothing except statements of a few people whose reliability is already under question?


Questions are good for your intellectual health!!! In the first century, even it was not possible to distinguish people as the dispute was only political and not religious.

So why should we accept narrations from such people who portray a bad picture of such personalities? We should not accept all incidents reported to us by historians without such evaluation. However, information available through Tawatur is something different and exceptional.

Recently, a group of Arab scholars named BarzanjiHallaqZia al- U’mri and Khalil have conducted that evaluation and found that large number of reports in this book are fake. And then he tried to convert the muslim khilafat into malookiat.

But I’ll advise you to not rely on me and conduct your haqwiq study. I read the book thoroughly but I am sorry instead of making me satisfy it has made me more doubtful. Mohadisin have devised a great procedure to evaluate authenticity of Hadith.

All those who accepted their caliphate will also be charged automatically as they accepted corrupt rulers. We should consider the following facts about these issues: When the matter is only an issue of doubtful reports, why should we form our opinions based on them.

Hazrat Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Haqaiq By Shaykh Mufti Taqi Usmani – Free Books

Regards A Sister May A riwaiat is not authentic because the rawi is shia and the same time another riwaiat by a shia rawi is authentic because it favours his opinion We cannot say about a theory that “it definitely has happened. Similarly, Banu A’bbas did the amerr to defame the Ummayyads. Why should we rely on secondary sources?

He only compiled the traditions and did not perform evaluation of such reports. I hope you ll not think that I am a Shia because ‘I am not’.


Hazrat Ameer Muaviyah [r.a] Aur Tareekhi Rivayaat By Shaykh Muhammad Saqib Risalpuri

Don’t hesitate to share your questions and comments. It is completely wrong to compare him with culprits like Zia or Musharaf. Large number of narrators who reported the incidents related to the civil wars of companion’s time were biased against the companions.

Why should we not do so in this case and leave the matter to Allah for such people who passed away a long time before us and we do not have reliable information available tareekui put a charge against them. Respected Sister Wa alaikum us salam wa Rahmatullah The views presented in the books belong to their authors and they are responsible for providing the answer raised on their work.

Thank you very much for answering me. Because in this way you can say that Zia- ul-Haq ruled for 11 years because he was a very patient person. I agree with you that narrations from such people should not muawiyx accepted in haqauq matters even it is in favor of our view. But the truth is truth. Tareekji a matter with such doubtful information is presented to any court in the world, the judge will not be able to decide the matter and will acquit the suspect based on the benefit of doubt despite of the fact that the suspect and relevant witnesses are available in his court.

Whatever is the opinion of Sunnis, Shias or Khawarij on such issues, it is no more than a theory based on doubtful reports because Sunni reports are not acceptable to Shia and vice versa.